Contributed by Mr. Greg Taylor
I am running for county commissioner county-wide. Obviously, I believe that I am the right person for the job or I would not be running. For a few years, I was not able to run for office because of my job. But for the last several years, I have not run because of the ongoing election manipulation by McCrae Dowless and his partners. When it looked like the authorities had finally put a stop to McCrae, I began to feel led to once again submit myself to the voters as a candidate. After prayerful consideration, I discussed it with my family and decided to file for county commissioner. So you might understand that I was very disappointed to read Mark Harris’s recent opinion piece in the paper. Here are some reasons why:
- How can Mark Harris feel that Joshua Malcolm and the NCSBE singled him out in 2018 when they had already referred McCrae Dowless to the US Attorney’s office to investigate his activities in the 2016 election? Given that fact, it seems only logical that authorities would be looking very closely at McCrae’s activities in the 2018 election.
- There were only 4 democrats on the 9 member, tri-partisan Board of Elections (with 4 republicans & 1 unaffiliated). They voted 7-2 not to certify Harris’s 2018 election.
- Then, after the change in the law, a new 5 member bipartisan Board of Elections (with 2 republicans) voted unanimously to call for a new election.
- Mark Harris’s own son, John Harris, is a lawyer in that same US Attorney’s office that had the file on McCrae from 2016. And John Harris testified that he repeatedly advised his father AGAINST involving McCrae Dowless in his campaign, referring to McCrae as a “shady character”.
- Mark Harris testified under oath that he was “unaware of any concerns regarding Dowless”, but his own son, the lawyer, had expressed very specific concerns to him, both verbally and in writing.
- Some say that we should not assume that what McCrae was doing was illegal. Here is what John Harris had to say on that topic. “I thought what he was doing was illegal and I was right.”
Unfortunately, Mark Harris decided that he could trust McCrae Dowless and Ray Britt’s judgment over that of his son. I do congratulate Mark Harris on his role in raising a very impressive young man. John Harris conducted himself with honor at that hearing, displaying strong character and integrity in a very difficult situation.
I also appreciate that Mark Harris pointed out that Ray Britt served on the local Board of Elections the whole time that McCrae Dowless was growing and building his electioneering scheme. It is also notable that when McCrae Dowless was finally arrested, Ray Britt was the one who bailed him out of jail. I am confident that in elections over the last 14 years, most of us have had multiple votes negated by McCrae’s election “activities”. I don’t know exactly how many candidates owe their victories to McCrae and his associates, but I’m sure that the number is significant.
It is disappointing that the most common argument I hear in defense of McCrae is that “such and such” other organization was doing it. Well even if true, just because someone else breaks the law, that does not give you the right to break the law. Right is right and wrong is wrong. It does not matter if you are a democrat, republican, black, white, red, green, or independent. If you were participating in illegal election activity, you should be called to account.
Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.” I, and most of you, have been patiently waiting, for 14 years, on our justice system to correct this. It’s time to stop waiting and step up. So what can we do? Right now it falls on you, the voter. Yes, I am one of Ray Britt’s opponents but I am not the only one. There are also David Gooden, Mark Gillespie, and Mike Cogdell. If for some reason you don’t feel that you can vote for me, there are other choices. But please, vote for someone that YOU can trust to at least TRY to put a stop to this. Enough is enough…
Contributed articles, letters and opinions are not neccessarily endorsed by this publication. Published opinions may not represent the opinions of this publication or the staff members of BladenOnline.com. BladenOnline supports the freedom of speech.